October 3, 2025 By: Nate O'Brien Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) are often presented as the perfect exit strategy. They can provide owners with liquidity, create powerful tax advantages, and give employees a sense of ownership in the business. For construction companies, however, ESOPs come with unique considerations that must be addressed before deciding if they are the right fit. Table of Contents The Upside of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan When structured correctly, ESOPs come with powerful tax benefits that can reduce or even eliminate corporate taxes. ESOPs also provide owners with liquidity and continuity: you can sell your shares to the ESOP and gain liquidity while keeping the business in the hands of people who already know it best. An employee stock ownership plan doesn’t have to be all or nothing: it offers business owners a tiered exit opportunity. Many owners sell a portion of their shares to the ESOP (often 30%-49%) and then take “another bite at the apple” later, when the company has grown in value. Additionally, giving employees a stake in the business can strengthen loyalty and foster an ownership mindset that drives performance. With skin in the game, employees are often more motivated to control costs, deliver quality, and protect the company’s reputation. The Challenges of ESOPs for Construction Companies Forming an employee stock ownership plan for a construction company can be a powerful succession and retention strategy, but it comes with unique challenges specific to the industry. Here are the key hurdles construction firms often face when implementing an ESOP: Bonding and surety requirements: Bonding companies will closely examine an ESOP structure. Bonding capacity may be affected if financial statements are weakened by debt or cash drain from the transaction. Cash flow demands: Construction businesses often face uneven cash flow and tight margins. An ESOP requires consistent profitability to handle contributions and debt service. Management depth: ESOPs work best with a strong leadership team beyond the selling owner. If everything depends on one person, the model may not be sustainable. Complexity and ongoing costs: Setting up an ESOP entails significant legal fees, administrative expenses, and management time. It is not a one-time event. Annual valuations are required for Department of Labor compliance, and year-round tracking of shares, participants, and contributions is essential for maintaining good standing. Six Questions to Ask Before Considering an ESOP Even if the upside looks appealing, not every construction company is positioned to make an ESOP work. The decision involves weighing financial realities, organizational readiness, and long-term commitment. Asking the right questions upfront can save time, money, and frustration later in the process. Before considering an ESOP, ask yourself the following questions: Can your company’s cash flow reliably support the transaction? ESOPs require steady profitability to fund contributions and service debt. How will an ESOP affect bonding capacity and relationships with banks? Sureties and lenders will scrutinize the impact of new leverage and ownership changes. Do you have a strong management bench that can lead after the owner steps back? ESOPs are most effective when leadership extends beyond a single individual. Is your company the right size for an ESOP? Smaller firms may find that the legal, administrative, and valuation costs outweigh the benefits, whereas mid-sized and larger firms can more effectively absorb the ongoing requirements. Are you prepared to sell at least 30% of the company? While any amount can technically be sold into an ESOP, selling at least 30% is often recommended because it unlocks special tax treatment under §1042 for C corporations and signals a meaningful commitment to the plan. What is your current entity structure? C corporations and S corporations are treated differently under ESOP rules. In some cases, it can be worth considering a change in structure before moving forward with a transaction. Finding the Right Path Forward For some construction owners, an ESOP is a powerful means of achieving both financial and legacy goals. For others, the risks outweigh the benefits, and a different transition strategy may be better. Management buyouts or key-employee transfers can also provide a tax-efficient path forward. If you have questions or need assistance, please use the form below to contact us. KatzAbosch can help you evaluate whether an ESOP is feasible for your construction company by modeling cash flow, assessing bonding implications, and comparing other transition strategies. Author: Nate O’Brien, CVA, CEPA Nate O’Brien is a Senior Manager with KatzAbosch’s Business Valuations Services Group. He has over 10 years of experience and is responsible for performing and overseeing valuations of closely held businesses and asset-holding companies. Nate has conducted valuations for a variety of purposes, including goodwill impairment analyses, purchase price allocations, equity-based compensation, S corporation conversions, and estate and gift tax. He works with various industries, including professional services, industrials, consumer products/services, and government contracting. Additionally, Nate specializes in supporting healthcare provider businesses with fair market valuations for federal Stark and Anti-Kickback purposes. Get in Touch: Δ X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. First Email What Can I Help You With? Related KatzAbosch Articles Construction Conversations with a Twist 2022 Tax Planning Opportunities for the Construction Industry COVID-19 and the Construction Industry
Is Your Construction Firm Ready for the Evolving Mobile Workforce? September 25, 2025 By: Claudia R. Wolter The Mobile Workforce 2025 white paper is your essential guide to navigating the complex landscape … Read More